Handling Legal Calls
by Elizabeth N. Baldwin,
JD
from LEAVEN, Vol. 30 No. 6, November-December 1994, pp. 85-7
We provide articles
from our publications from previous years for reference for our Leaders and
members. Readers are cautioned to remember that research and medical information
change over time
Generally, legal calls fall
into one of these categories:
- Breastfeeding in public--a
mother is told that she cannot breastfeed in some public location.
- Employment--mother wants
to pump her milk or breastfeed her baby on her breaks and the employer
is unsupportive or prohibits it.
- Family law--divorce and
paternity actions where the father seeks overnight, weekend or longer
visits with a breastfeeding child, or seeks custody.
Recent legislation can help
in all of these types of cases.
Most legal calls involve
two elements: the importance of breastfeeding and the balancing of various
competing interests while protecting the breastfeeding relationship.
When the importance of breastfeeding is the issue, legislation enacted
in the United States during the past two years offers tremendous help
to Leaders whether the issue arises in a state with this legislation
or not. See "Breastfeeding Legislation
in the United States," NEW BEGINNINGS Nov/Dec 1994 for more information
about these laws. [Web editor's note: see also A
Current Summary of Breastfeeding Legislation in the U.S. for current
information.]
Breastfeeding Is Not a Lifestyle
Choice
All current breastfeeding
legislation has one thing in common: it emphasizes the fact that breastfeeding
is an important health choice for mother and baby and that breastfeeding
must be encouraged. For instance, new laws in the US states of Florida
and New York recite some of the health benefits to mother and baby,
the recommendations of the US Surgeon General, and the sad fact that
far too few mothers are choosing to breastfeed or to continue breastfeeding.
Although most of the legislation deals with a mother's right to breastfeed
in public, the legislation was not enacted because it is illegal to
breastfeed in public anywhere. The laws were enacted in the hope that
if one more stumbling block is removed from a mother's decision to breastfeed
or continue breastfeeding that it will help increase the incidence and
duration of breastfeeding.
Thus, the best way Leaders
can help is to educate mothers about the new laws and to stress why
the laws were enacted. For example, a Leader could educate someone on
this issue with the following information:
"Breastfeeding is not a lifestyle
choice, but an important health choice for mother and baby. For instance,
breastfeeding reduces the mother's risk of premenopausal breast cancer
(McTiernan, 1986), ovarian cancer (Gwinn, 1990) and cervical cancer
(Brock, 1989). As a matter of fact, a recent study indicates that if
all mothers breastfed their children until two years of age, breast
cancer could decline in the US by 25% (Newcomb, 1994). Not only that,
breastfed children have less risk of developing breast cancer (Freudenheim,
1994). Breastfeeding reduces the child's risk of meningitis (Kassim,
1989), juvenile diabetes (Karjalainen, 1992), childhood cancers (Schwartzbaum,
1991), SIDS (Mitchell, 1991), Crohn's disease (Bergstrand, 1983) celiac
disease (Auricchio, 1983), chronic liver disorders (Udall, 1985), and
many less serious illnesses (Cunningham, 1991). The health benefits
continue not only through the entire breastfeeding relationship, but
the risk of some illnesses may be further reduced the longer a mother
breastfeeds (Chilvers, 1993; Wolff, 1993; Owen, 1993). These significant
health benefits have been recognized by the Executive Director of UNICEF
in his letter to all physicians dated June 29, 1994, in which he urges
the medical profession to actively encourage breastfeeding. The American
Academy of Pediatrics states that all babies should be breastfed for
one year unless medically contraindicated (AAP, 1989) and the World
Health Organization, UNICEF, and World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action
are encouraging breastfeeding until age two or beyond (Innocenti Declaration,
1990). This is the reason why several US states (including Florida,
New York, North Carolina Virginia and Michigan) have enacted legislation
to protect a mother's right to breastfeed in public, and why Florida
enacted a new law stating that breastfeeding must be encouraged in the
interest of maternal and child health."
Leaders can give mothers
"Breastfeeding Does Make a Difference" (No. 64), "Facts About Breastfeeding"
(No. 545g), a copy of the letter by the Executive Director of UNICEF,
and information on the Innocenti Declaration (included in the World
Alliance For Breastfeeding Action [WABA] folder "Women, Work and Breastfeeding:
Everybody Benefits!" No. 432b). These materials can help the mother
educate her lawyer and anyone else who needs breastfeeding information.
However, not all legal calls
are resolved by education about the importance of breastfeeding. There
are often many other issues that must be dealt with or competing interests
that must be protected.
Nursing in Public
Most of the new legislation
is designed to protect a mother's right to breastfeed in public. This
legislation is being enacted not because it is illegal to breastfeed
anywhere, but because the public perception is that breastfeeding is,
or may be, indecent exposure. It is the hope of the legislatures that
if it is clarified that breastfeeding is something to be encouraged,
more women will feel free to nurse in public, thus increasing the incidence
and duration of breastfeeding.
Although several states have
enacted legislation protecting the right to nurse in public, only New
York has provided a remedy for violation of this right. Prohibiting
a mother from breastfeeding in New York is a violation of her civil
rights! There are really no competing interests involved other than
another's right not to have to see a mother breastfeed. If some one
is uncomfortable seeing a mother breastfeed, that person can look the
other way. We know that breastfeeding reduces the risk of many serious
illnesses. We also know that if mothers give bottles in the early weeks
and do not nurse on demand, there is an increased chance that breastfeeding
will fail. Would we want even one mother or one baby to have an increased
risk of illness just because someone doesn't want to see breastfeeding?
Employment Cases
More and more calls are coming
in from mothers having difficulty breastfeeding in the workplace. As
more mothers realize that they can continue to breastfeed when they
return to work, the issue arises more frequently. The new legislation
is very helpful.
Not only can a Leader give
mothers information on the importance of breastfeeding, there are additional
materials that deserve mention in this area. "Women Work and Breastfeeding:
Everyone Benefits!" (WABA Action Folder, 1993, No. 432b) helps educate
employers as to what is desired globally. It also tells an employer
how supporting breastfeeding can be good for business. Another is Florida's
1994 law setting up a project to determine the feasibility of turning
the whole state into a baby-friendly workplace. Florida's new law, entitled
"Access to Breastfeeding for Public Sector Employees Demonstration Project"
(Fla.Stat. 383.018(6)), calls for the drafting of written policies supporting
breastfeeding practices for the workplace. It addresses issues including
work schedule flexibility; access to clean, comfortable places to pump
or nurse; adequate break time; and access to a place to clean breast
pump equipment and store breast milk. The written policies will be implemented
in Miami, Florida, beginning November 1994, with a full report given
to the legislature by December 1995 including evaluations and recommendations
to implement the project statewide.
This legislation is the first
of its kind and will set the scene for how breastfeeding issues are
handled in the work place. What employer would discourage breastfeeding
knowing that it is so important that legislation is being enacted to
protect it? Wouldn't an employer want to lead the way by voluntarily
encouraging breastfeeding?
Other sources of information
are local task forces or state Healthy Mother Healthy Baby programs,
where mothers may be able to get information on programs or projects
that are targeting employers. Mothers also may want to contact Medela
or Ameda/Egnell about their corporate lactation programs and find out
if employers in their state are participating.
The best way to help a mother
in such cases is to educate employers about the importance of breastfeeding,
show how it benefits employer as well as employee, and explain what
is being done to promote breastfeeding in the workplace globally and
nationally. However, keep in mind that if a mother thinks that she has
been discriminated against or that she may need to take legal action,
she should get good legal advice immediately because there are strict
time limits on filing discrimination actions and labor law cases. If
the mother misses the deadline, her case may be barred.
Family Law Cases
Family law cases are more
difficult because the competing interests in these cases are very compelling.
Educating the parties involved about the importance of breastfeeding
will only partially help a mother. The reason for this is that the courts
will not pick breastfeeding over a bond with the father, even though
they may recognize that breastfeeding is important and best for the
child. Even if the mother does prove how important breastfeeding is,
if she does not also deal with the related issues of separation and
attachment, she may be told to just pump her breasts so the father can
have overnight or weekend visitation.
Whether in a divorce or paternity
action, the primary concern of the court is to protect the child's relationship
with both parents after they separate. If one parent is asking for restricted
or shorter visitation, the court carefully scrutinizes the situation.
Since many courts look at which parent will provide better access to
the other parent and which parent will help foster a close relationship
between the other parent and the child, mothers need to use caution
if they are asking for visitation that is not considered standard in
the mother's area.
In looking at the competing
interests here (namely, the father's bond), it seems obvious that the
best way to protect the breastfeeding relationship is to show the court
not just why breastfeeding is important, but how the breastfeeding relationship
can be protected while the father's bond is encouraged. The mother needs
to reassure the court that she wants the father involved in the child's
life, that she wants him to have a bond, and that she also values a
bond between father and child. Mothers who do not want the father to
be in the child's life have a difficult road ahead of them and often
are more at risk of losing custody than any other group of mothers.
In order to protect the breastfeeding
relationship, mothers need to understand that a child's best interests
require balancing the competing interests of breastfeeding and a bond
with the father. Most mothers have trouble balancing these interests
objectively because of their anger. Counseling is an excellent resource
for mothers. It will give them a safe outlet for letting out their anger
and developing communication skills so that they can work with the baby's
father.
Although education on the
superiority of human milk is important in these cases, it is more important
that the mother address the psychological issues involved. These should
be proven legally by a psychiatrist, psychologist or other mental health
professional. If the focus is on how beneficial breastfeeding is without
dealing with the separation issues, there is a much greater chance that
the court could decide that delivery of the mother's milk, by any means,
will protect the breastfeeding relationship.
It is generally not wise
to raise breastfeeding as an issue past age one and certainly not past
age two. Unfortunately, many experts may be uneducated and unsupportive
of breastfeeding, especially when it comes to nursing past infancy.
Also, most toddlers can be separated from their mothers for quite a
long time and still return to breastfeeding. It is not the breastfeeding
relationship that is at risk, but rather the separation issue. Securely
attached children who are not accustomed to separations, breastfed or
not, would be equally distressed by long separations. Not only that,
if the mother leads the court to believe that overnight visits are impossible
because of breastfeeding, she risks being told to wean. The courts will
not give preference to breastfeeding if it seems to interfere with a
bond with the father.
Whether or not the mother's
case is going to court, it helps to have reasonable and sensible visitation
plans. Visitation that is best for the child begins with what the child
is already accustomed to, gradually increasing in time every few months
until the visits have worked up to overnight, weekends and summer visitation.
Visitation plans should give the most visitation the child can handle,
not the least. The best way to convince a judge to put off lengthy visitations
with the father is to show the court how the father can have short,
frequent visits.
Any legal call where the
mother is alleging that the father is abusive is a red flag case. These
cases can be problematic. If the mother is unable to legally prove the
abuse through admissable evidence, the court may conclude that the mother
will deny the father access, or that she will poison the child's mind
against the father. This can be enough to convince a court that the
father will be the better parent in that it may appear he would encourage
the other parent's bond better than the mother would.
Other Legal Cases
In other types of legal cases,
educating the parties involved about the importance of breastfeeding
is probably the best course of action. Providing information on new
laws that have been passed is one easy way to do this. See LEAVEN
Sept/Oct 1994 for information on jury duty cases. Criminal cases,
where a breastfeeding mother is sentenced to jail for charges unrelated
to breastfeeding or a pregnant mother gives birth in jail and wants
to breastfeed, can be very upsetting to handle. The right to rear our
children is inconsistent with incarceration. However, there are some
places that allow the mother to keep the baby with her during the first
year of life. In most cases the best that can be accomplished is educating
the attorney on the importance of breastfeeding in the hope that it
may help the mother's lawyer work out an arrangement for her to continue
breastfeeding.
Careful handling is required
in cases where the mother is charged with a crime related to breastfeeding
(such as using drugs that harm the baby), or social service agency cases,
where a mother is reported for abuse/neglect and the issue of extended
breastfeeding or low weight gain is raised. These cases can have serious
implications for other breastfeeding mothers by setting bad precedents.
With personal injury cases,
where a mother is unable to breastfeed because of injury due to an accident
or injury to her breast, education about breastfeeding is what is needed
to help her prove that she has lost something valuable.
Leaders should contact their
Area Professional Liaison (APL) when they receive a legal call. It is
important to get help with legal calls as it may be difficult to determine
what the real issues are, what help is really needed, and how to avoid
saying things that might be misused later on. The APL can confer with
me or may refer a Leader or mother directly to me in urgent cases. As
we all learn more about legal situations we'll be better able to help
the next mother with a legal problem.
REFERENCES
Auricchio, S. et al. Does
breastfeeding protect against celiac disease in children? J Pediatr
Gastro & Nutr 1983; 2: 428-33.
Bergstrand, O. and Hellers,
G. Breastfeeding in infancy in patients who later developed Crohn's
disease. Scand J Gastroentero 1983; 18: 903-06.
Brook, K.E. et al. Sexual
reproductive and contraceptive risk factors for carcinoma-in-situ of
the uterine cervix in Sidney. Med J Aust 1989; 150: 125-30.
Cunningham, A.S. et al. Breastfeeding
and health in the 1980s: a global epidemiologic review. J Pediatr May
1991; 118: 659-66.
Freudenheim, J.L. et al.
Exposure to breast milk in infancy and the risk of breast cancer. Epidemiology
1994; 5(3): 324-31.
Gwinn, M.L. et al. Pregnancy,
breastfeeding and oral contraceptives and the risk of epithelial ovarian
cancer. J Olin Epidemiol 1990; 43(6): 559-68.
Karjalainen, J. et al. A
bovine albumin peptide as a possible trigger of insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus. N Engl J Med1992; 327(5): 302-07.
Kassim, O.O. et al. Class-specific
antibodies to bordetella pertussis, haemophilus influenzas type b, streptococcus
pneumonias and neisseria meningitis in human breast milk and maternal-infant
sera. Ann Trop Paediatr 1989; 9:226-32.
McTiernan, A. and Thomas,
D.B. Evidence for a protective effect of lactation on risk of breast
cancer in young women. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 124(3): 353-58.
Mitchell, A. et al. Cot death
supplement: results from the first year of the New Zealand cot death
study. N Z Med J 1991; 104:71-76.
Newcomb, P.A. et al. Lactation
and a reduced risk of premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1994;
330(2): 81-87.
Schwartzbaum, J. et al. An
exploratory study of environmental and medical factors potentially related
to childhood cancer. Med & Pediat Oncology 1991; 19(2): 115-21.
Udall, Jr., J.N. et al. Liver
disease in al-antitrypsin deficiency: a retrospective analysis of the
influence of early breast-vs-bottle-feeding. JAMA 1985; 18: Z679 82
OTHER HELPFUL REFERENCES
Florida Statutes, section
383.015 (1993); Florida Statutes, section 383.018(6) (1994).
New York Senate Bill No.
3999-A, 1994 Regular Session, Chapter 98, New York Advance Legislative
Service.
Baldwin, E. and Friedman,
K. Is Breastfeeding Really a
Visitation Issue? Mothering Fall 1993; 68.
Baldwin, E. Extended Breastfeeding
and the law. Mothering Spring 1993; 66.
Grant, JP. Executive Director
of UNICEF. Call to physicians for support. Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative
Newsletter Jul/Aug 1994 (available from LLLI).
Kneidel, S. Nursing beyond
one year. NEW BEGINNINGS, Jul/Aug 1990.
La Leche League International.
Breastfeeding Rights Packet (No. 78), Custody/Visitation Arrangements
for the Breastfeeding Child (No. 78c), Breastfeeding Does Make a Difference
(No. 64), Facts about Breastfeeding (No.545g).
Suhler, A, Bornmann, PG,
and Scott, JW. The lactation consultant as expert witness. J Human Lact
September l991; 7(3): 129-40.
Wilson-Clay, B. Extended
Breastfeeding as a legal issue: an annotated bibliography. J Human Lact
June 1990; 6(2): 68-71.
Editor's Note: While this
article pertains to legislation in the USA, we welcome input from Leaders
in other countries about legal situations that affect breastfeeding.
[Web Editor's note: several
other articles by Elizabeth Baldwin can be found on the LLLI Web Site
at Breastfeeding and the Law.]
Page last edited Sun Oct 14 09:31:53 UTC 2007.